stock-vs-flow-gas
Credit: CLEAR Center at UC Davis

While all greenhouse gases (GHG) have a warming effect on our planet, this warming effect is not equivalent across all GHG. These gases behave differently in the atmosphere and their long-term effects on climate change vary. The major factor contributing to a GHG warming effect is whether it is a stock or flow gas.  

What is stock gas? 

Stock gases are long-lived gases. Meaning, once emitted, stock gasses will remain and stockpile in the atmosphere for thousands of years. Carbon dioxide (CO2) emitted from the burning of fossil fuels is the most abundant stock gas in our atmosphere and significantly contributes to climate change. So, every time we drive our gas powered cars to work, to school, to the grocery store, and beyond, the CO2 emitted from the tailpipe builds upon CO2 already in the atmosphere and will have a warming effect on our climate for thousands of years.  

Fossil Fuel Extraction CO2
Credit: CLEAR Center at UC Davis

 

What is flow gas? 

Unlike stock gases, flow gases are short-lived and are removed from the atmosphere at a much faster pace. Flow gases don’t buildup in the atmosphere so their warming impact is shorter lived than stock gases. Methane is a flow gas with an atmospheric lifespan of about 10 years. After an initial emission pulse of methane, there will be a warming effect; however, if the emission rate of methane remains constant over time methane will be destroyed at the rate it is produced. Thus, temperatures will stabilize and there will be no additional warming effect.  

Why does the difference between stock and flow gas matter? 

Stock and flow gases have drastically different lifecycles, which is what ultimately makes them so different. 

Fossil fuels companies emitting carbon dioxide (CO2), a stock gas, are dumping this GHG into the atmosphere at a much faster rate than it can be naturally absorbed by oceans and plants. This carbon dioxide will not only remain in the atmosphere for an indefinite length of time, but it will build-up in the atmosphere. That means CO2 emissions from today will be combined with emissions from yesterday and so forth, creating a stockpile of CO2 in the atmosphere. 

Cattle and other ruminants emit methane into the atmosphere, but differs from CO2 as a pollutant because it is a flow gas. Current standards say one molecule of methane is equal to 28 molecules of CO2 over 100 years, but methane only stays in the atmosphere for about 10 years before being destroyed. In addition to being short-lived, methane from cattle is part of the biogenic carbon cycle. As part of photosynthesis, plants capture CO2 from the atmosphere, absorbing the carbon and releasing the oxygen. That carbon is converted into carbohydrates in the plant, which is then consumed by a cow where it’s digested and released from the cow as methane. After 10 years in the atmosphere, that methane is broken down and converted back into CO2. Those carbon molecules are the same carbon molecules that were in the plant the cow ate, which was pulled from the atmosphere by the plant and now back in the atmosphere. It is not additional carbon to the atmosphere.  

Biogenic Carbon Cycle CLEAR Center
Credit: CLEAR Center at UC Davis

With a flow gas, if its emission rate doesn’t increase, then it’s not adding additional warming to the planet. For example, if cattle herd sizes don’t increase then methane and warming levels don’t significantly increase, because for every pulse of methane emitted by a cow, one is destroyed in the atmosphere. In fact, if methane from cattle is reduced, then it can generate a cooling effect, because the carbon cycle can now help to offset CO2 from fossil fuels. 

Comparing a stock gas to a flow gas is an apples-to-oranges comparison that distracts from real climate change solutions.  

Tags

Subscribe to the CLEAR Center Newsletter

* indicates required